A retail organization was facing challenges in analyzing large volumes of daily customer feedback manually. Microsoft implemented an LLM-based solution using Azure OpenAI to automatically extract themes, sentiments, and competitor comparisons from customer feedback. The system uses carefully engineered prompts and predefined themes to ensure consistent analysis, enabling the creation of actionable insights and reports at various organizational levels.
This case study from Microsoft’s ISE (Industry Solutions Engineering) team describes a customer engagement with a leading retailer to build an LLM-powered system for analyzing customer feedback at scale. The retailer was receiving tens of thousands of feedback comments daily, making manual review impractical. Traditional NLP models were found to be ineffective, particularly for handling lengthy review comments. The solution leveraged Azure OpenAI with GPT models to extract themes, sentiment, and competitor comparisons from shopper feedback, enabling the business to make data-driven decisions to improve customer satisfaction.
It’s worth noting that this blog post is somewhat prescriptive and represents a reference architecture rather than a fully detailed production deployment. The authors acknowledge that evaluation of LLM outputs is critical before rolling out to production, though the specifics of evaluation techniques are not covered in detail.
The high-level architecture centers on a data pipeline that ingests customer feedback from various data sources, performs data cleansing and enrichment, and then calls Azure OpenAI to generate insights. The core module, referred to as the “Themes Extraction and Sentiment Generator,” handles the LLM interactions.
The data pipeline approach reflects LLMOps best practices by treating LLM calls as part of a broader data processing workflow. Key components include:
The emphasis on data preparation before LLM calls is a practical LLMOps consideration that many organizations overlook. Garbage in, garbage out applies strongly to LLM applications.
A significant portion of the case study focuses on iterative prompt engineering, which is presented as the primary technique for achieving reliable, production-quality outputs. The authors describe an evolutionary approach to prompt development:
The initial prompt was basic: “Extract all the themes mentioned in the provided feedback and for each of the themes generate the sentiment.” Running this simple prompt repeatedly revealed inconsistency problems—the same underlying concepts would be extracted as different themes across runs (e.g., “Cleanliness” vs. “Neatness” vs. “Tidiness”). This lack of consistency made the outputs unsuitable for analytics purposes like trend analysis.
To address inconsistency, the team developed a predefined list of themes through an iterative process: repeatedly running the basic prompt across feedback from different time periods, manually reviewing and grouping similar themes, then selecting the most appropriate representative theme from each group. Subject matter experts from the retail domain contributed to finalizing this list.
The predefined themes for this retail use case include:
By constraining the LLM to select from this predefined list, the system produces consistent, comparable outputs suitable for aggregation and trend analysis.
The prompts explicitly request JSON-formatted output, which is essential for downstream processing in production systems. The system prompt establishes the AI’s role, the expected input format, the task requirements, and the output format. This structured approach makes the outputs programmatically consumable.
The case study demonstrates how prompts can be incrementally enhanced to extract additional information:
First, theme extraction was added with sentiment classification (positive, negative, or neutral). Then, competitor comparison extraction was layered on, asking the model to identify mentions of competing retailers and the sentiment associated with those comparisons. This progressive refinement approach is valuable for LLMOps practitioners who need to balance prompt complexity with reliability.
The blog touches on several important LLMOps considerations for production deployment:
The authors explicitly note that evaluation of LLM outputs using different evaluation techniques is critical before the solution can be rolled out to production. While the specifics aren’t covered, this acknowledgment reflects mature thinking about LLMOps practices. The gap between a working prototype and a production-ready system often lies in rigorous evaluation.
The case study emphasizes masking sensitive data in reviews before sending to the LLM, ensuring the solution follows Responsible AI principles. This is a critical consideration for any production LLM deployment, particularly when dealing with customer-generated content that may contain personally identifiable information.
The discussion of inconsistent theme generation highlights a fundamental challenge in LLM production systems: non-deterministic outputs. The solution of using predefined theme categories is a practical constraint-based approach to improve reliability, though it does limit the system’s ability to discover new, emergent themes.
The system is designed to generate insights at the store level that can be aggregated up through district, state, regional, and national levels. This hierarchical reporting structure requires consistent, structured outputs—reinforcing the importance of the constrained prompt approach.
The LLM outputs feed into various reporting capabilities:
Integration with Microsoft Power BI is mentioned, suggesting a typical enterprise analytics workflow where LLM-generated insights are consumed through existing business intelligence infrastructure.
While the case study presents a useful reference architecture, several limitations should be noted:
The architecture is presented at a conceptual level, and practitioners would need to fill in significant details around error handling, retry logic, rate limiting, model versioning, monitoring, and other operational concerns.
Despite its limitations, the case study offers several practical insights:
This case study represents a practical, if somewhat high-level, guide to building LLM-powered feedback analysis systems in retail contexts, with patterns applicable to other industries receiving customer feedback.
Snorkel developed a specialized benchmark dataset for evaluating AI agents in insurance underwriting, leveraging their expert network of Chartered Property and Casualty Underwriters (CPCUs). The benchmark simulates an AI copilot that assists junior underwriters by reasoning over proprietary knowledge, using multiple tools including databases and underwriting guidelines, and engaging in multi-turn conversations. The evaluation revealed significant performance variations across frontier models (single digits to ~80% accuracy), with notable error modes including tool use failures (36% of conversations) and hallucinations from pretrained domain knowledge, particularly from OpenAI models which hallucinated non-existent insurance products 15-45% of the time.
This comprehensive case study examines how multiple enterprises (Autodesk, KPMG, Canva, and Lightspeed) are deploying AI agents in production to transform their go-to-market operations. The companies faced challenges around scaling AI from proof-of-concept to production, managing agent quality and accuracy, and driving adoption across diverse teams. Using the Relevance AI platform, these organizations built multi-agent systems for use cases including personalized marketing automation, customer outreach, account research, data enrichment, and sales enablement. Results include significant time savings (tasks taking hours reduced to minutes), improved pipeline generation, increased engagement rates, faster customer onboarding, and the successful scaling of AI agents across multiple departments while maintaining data security and compliance standards.
OpenAI's Forward Deployed Engineering (FDE) team, led by Colin Jarvis, embeds with enterprise customers to solve high-value problems using LLMs and deliver production-grade AI applications. The team focuses on problems worth tens of millions to billions in value, working with companies across industries including finance (Morgan Stanley), manufacturing (semiconductors, automotive), telecommunications (T-Mobile, Klarna), and others. By deeply understanding customer domains, building evaluation frameworks, implementing guardrails, and iterating with users over months, the FDE team achieves 20-50% efficiency improvements and high adoption rates (98% at Morgan Stanley). The approach emphasizes solving hard, novel problems from zero-to-one, extracting learnings into reusable products and frameworks (like Swarm and Agent Kit), then scaling solutions across the market while maintaining strategic focus on product development over services revenue.
